Home What We
Pages By
Pages By

(An Adobe PDF Version Of This File Is Available Here)
(A WordPerfect Version Of This File Is Available Here)
(The Audio For This Series Is Available Here)





The Sheer Numbers and Bloody Facts
Some Statistics for First Time and Repeat Abortions
States That Dominate the Murdering Fields of Abortion
Abortions for Minors and Mothers 14 Years Old or Younger
The Utter Barbarity of Partial Birth Abortions
Is There Racial Profiling in Abortions?
The Deception, Hypocrisy and Criminality of Planned Parenthood
Gross Negligence in Government Reporting of Abortion Statistics
Legal Requirements in Brief
Abortion Is Big Business
The Butchering, Torturing, and Poisoning Acts of the Abortionists
The Growth of the Baby in the Womb
Does Abortion Cause the Baby Pain?
The Dangers of Abortion to the Mother
The Emotional, Spiritual, and Social Consequences of Abortion
Economic Impact of Abortion
Who Has Abortions?
Why Are Abortions Performed?
Dealing with the Abortionists and Abortion Advocates
Questions That Abortionists Ask



The Blood Of The Innocents Crieth Up From The Ground: What Saith The Scriptures The Murder Of The Innocents-The Abomination Of Abortion: The Facts Part 1
The Murder Of The Innocents-The Abomination Of Abortion: The Facts Part 2 The Murder Of The Innocents-The Abomination Of Abortion: The Facts Part 3
The Murder Of The Innocents-The Abomination Of Abortion: The Facts Part 4 The Murder Of The Innocents-The Abomination Of Abortion: The Facts Part 5

(Back To Top)

The bloody butchers of the American Holocaust have murdered at least 57,000,000 (57 million) babies on their butcher blocks since the antichrist United States Supreme Court legalized the murder of unborn babies in 1973. TAKE A LOOK AT THE BABIES IN THE MARGINS OF THIS WEB PAGE. Had these baby murdering, bloody butchers had their way all the babies in the margins would have been torn apart on their butcher blocks: for a fee of course.
Abortion in the United States of America is the American perpetrated holocaust against babies. It is the murder of the innocents. The atrocities and genocides of Adolph Hitler pale by comparison. America’s sexual revolution has been paid for by the blood of aborted babies.
Abortion is the fruit of adultery, fornication and sexual promiscuity in America. Unwanted babies are the reminders of the fornication you participated in the the night before. The violation of God’s laws governing sexual relationships by participating in unbridled sexual affairs has consequences. God’s method of birth control is not abortion or birth control pills. God’s method of birth control is abstinence. If you think the sexual pleasure you had the night before should be paid for by the execution of a baby, you are dead wrong in the eyes of God. The act of abortion is an act of murder in the eyes of God. What follows is a description of the barbarity and atrocity that has resulted from the unbridled sexual fornication of reprobate America.

(Back To Top)

Abortion is an act of violence against an innocent human being. According to the Bible, abortion is murder. I am convinced that any individual who can commit the Satanic, ungodly act of abortion has a seared conscience. They are the same type of individuals who worked in the Nazi death camps at Auschwitz and Treblinka. If you have, or perform, an abortion you are putting a child to death. While we believe that performing an abortion is murder, we do not advocate taking justice into your own hands. It is the duty of the state to prosecute and execute those guilty of premeditated murder. Abortion is premeditated murder. Regardless of whether abortion is legalized, where the state will not execute judgement and justice for the murder of the innocents, God will judge that nation. Making abortions “legal” makes them nothing more than state sanctioned murder. There is another form of birth control out there called sodomy that God will judge this nation for.
For those of you who do not know it, Kathleen Sebelius, Obama’s Health and Human Services Secretary, has mandated a rule that will require enrollees in the healthcare exchange plan under Obamacare to pay a $1 a month abortion surcharge. This is in violation of federal law and a promise by Barack Hussein Obama that there would be no federal money used to fund abortions under Obamacare.
Let me state at the outset that abortion clinics are Satan’s killing fields where mothers without natural affection pay Satan’s devils to kill their unborn babies. Baby murdering abortionists are another evil cadre in Satan’s pantheon of devils . Abortion clinics are nothing more than Satan’s baby murdering, human slaughterhouses. When dealing with a baby murdering abortionist or abortion advocate never use the term “fetus”. Always refer to the person whom they kill as a precious baby. The most damnable decision ever of the United States Supreme Court was the Roe vs Wade decision in 1973 that legalized the murder of babies (euphemistically known as abortion) nationally. Using figures that were available from the National Right To Life Committee on October 29,2017, American mothers, reprobate fathers, and state sanctioned baby killers have murdered 60,042,185babies since the abominable Roe vs Wade decision in 1973. What that means is that the blood of an annual average of 1,364,595 babies cries up to God from the so-called hallowed ground of America. The peak year in numbers for baby killings was 1990 when state sanctioned murderers killed 1,608,600 babies In America. That means that one baby was murdered every 19.6 seconds in 1990. That is 184 babies per hour and 4,416 babies per day. The Satanic carnage decreased to 1,212,400 for 2011. What that means is that Satan’s abortionist hit men and women murdered one baby every 26 seconds in America in 2011. That equates to 3,323 abortions per day, or, 138 abortions per hour. Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion provider in the world. Calling themselves Planned Parenthood is a travesty. They should be called Planned Abortionhood. Planned Parenthood is Satan’s American kingpin of baby killing hit men, murdering one baby every 96 seconds in America in 2011. In America, the peak years in terms of percentage of abortions versus pregnancies were 1980 through 1983 when the abortion rates averaged 30% of pregnancies per year in this abominable branch of the nations known as the United States of America. That equates to 300 abortions for every 1,000 live births!!
To put the 60 million figure we quoted in the last paragraph in perspective, it exceeds the combined populations of the countries of Denmark, Finland, Ireland, Norway, Sweden, Austria, and Belgium. To put the figures in further perspective, consider that the number of children aborted each year in America exceeds the total number of American deaths in the Revolutionary War, the Civil War, World War I, World War II, the Korean War, the Vietnam war, and the Persian Gulf Wars combined. The combined deaths for all these wars was 1,279,945.
In New York City in 2009, there were 398 abortions out of every 1,000 pregnancies. The top 10 baby murdering states in 2008 were California with 214,190, New York with 153,110, Florida with 94,360, Texas with 84,610, Illinois with 54,920, New Jersey with 54,160, Pennsylvania with 41,000, Georgia with 39,820, Michigan with 36,790, and Maryland with 34,290. In 2007 there were 196,00 abortions in the age group of 15-19, 395,000 in the age group 20-24, and 295,000 in the age group 25-29. The abortion rate declined from an average of 2.74% in 1990 to an average of 1.95% in 2007. There were 1,609,000 abortions in 1990 and 1,200,00 abortions in 2007. The abortion rate among white mothers declined from a high of 2.15% in 1990 to a low of 1.38% in 2007. The abortion rate among black mothers declined from a rate of 6.39% in 1990 to 4.82% in 2007. (Source: R.K. Jones and K. Kooistra, “Abortion Incidence and Access to Services in the United States, 2008). Nearly half of all women who get abortions each year are repeat offenders. What that means is that they have already had at least one abortion. There were more than 148,000 second an third trimester abortions in 2003 (Source: National Right To Life Committee). Forty percent (40%) of minors having an abortion report that neither of their parents knew about the abortion.
In 2008, the following figures are given as a breakdown for the abortions committed during that year:

≤6 Weeks: 30.7% (371,470), 7 Weeks: 18.1% (219,010), 8 Weeks: 14.0% (169,400), 9 Weeks: 9.6% (116,160), 10 Weeks: 6.8% (82,280) 11 Weeks: 5.3% (64,130), 12 Weeks: 4.0% (48,400), 13 Weeks: 2.9% (35,090), 14-15 Weeks: 3.5% (42,350), 16-17 Weeks: 2.0% (24,200), 18-20 Weeks: 1.9% (22,990), ≥21 Weeks: 1.3% (15,730), Totals: 1,210,000.

These figures are from CDC reports. An analysis of these figures indicate that 8.7% of these abortions, or 105,270, were second trimester abortions.

In 2013, the following figures are given by abort73.com as a breakdown for the abortions committed during that year:

≤6 Weeks: 34.6% (366,237), 7 Weeks: 17.9% (189,469), 8 Weeks: 13.4% (141,837), 9 Weeks: 8.6% (91,030), 10 Weeks: 5.8% (61,392) 11 Weeks: 4.7% (49,739), 12 Weeks: 3.6% (38,105), 13 Weeks: 2.8% (29,637), 14-15 Weeks: 3.4% (35,988), 16-17 Weeks: 1.90% (20,111), 18-20 Weeks: 1.8% (19,052), ≥21 Weeks: 1.3% (13,760), Totals: 1,058,490.
[http://abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/ : Accessed November 1, 2017]

An analysis of these figures indicate that 8.4% of these abortions, or 89,911, were second trimester abortions. For the total abortion statistics for the United States from 1973-2015 see page 4 of the table located HERE .

(Back To Top)

Those having had zero (0) previous live births constituted 188,874 (40.2 %) of the abortions in 2013; having had 1 previous live birth constituted 122,464 (26.0%); having had 2 previous live births constituted 92,275 (19.6%); having had 3 previous live births constituted 41,425 (8.8%); and having had 4 previous live births constituted 25,077 (5.3%). These figures do not include figures from every state. In fact the figures do not include the data for three of the biggest abortion states. According to CDC:

“Data from 41 reporting areas; excludes 11 areas (California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York State, Wisconsin, and Wyoming) that did not report, did not report by number of previous births, or did not meet reporting standards.”

However the figures do include New York City which reported a total of 67,686 abortions according to Table 16 in the CDC report for 2013. The total abortions reported in this table was 470,115 (97.2%). What happened to the other 2.8% CDC does not adequately explain. These figures do not include huge numbers of the abortions that were performed in 2013 in states who routinely do not report abortion statistics to CDC.

[https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/ss/ss6512a1.htm : Accessed November 1, 2017]

Those having had zero (0) previous abortions constituted 240,969 (55%) of the abortions in 2013; having had 1 previous abortion constituted 108,629 (24.8%); having had 2 previous abortions constituted 49,885 (11.4%) ; and having had 3 or more previous abortions constituted 38,394 (8.8%). Again, these figures do not include figures from every state. In fact, the figures do not include the data for three of the biggest abortion states. According to CDC:

“Data from 39 reporting areas; excludes 13 areas (California, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York State, North Carolina, Wisconsin, and Wyoming) that did not report, did not report by the number of previous induced abortions, or did not meet reporting standards.” [https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/ss/ss6512a1.htm : Accessed November 1, 2017]

What that means is that almost half, or 45%, of abortions were performed on repeat offenders in 2013. As stated in the quote above, these figures do not include huge numbers of the abortions that were performed in 2013 in states such as California who do not report abortion statistics to the federal government.

(Back To Top)

The highest number of 2014 abortions occurred in California (157,350), New York (119,940) and Florida (75,990); the fewest occurred in Wyoming (120), South Dakota (550) and North Dakota (1,260) (AGI). In 2013, approximately 37.4% of all pregnancies in New York City (excluding spontaneous miscarriages) ended in abortion (CDC).

[http://abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/ : Accessed November 1, 2017]

An analysis of 2014 data available from the CDC, the Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI), and the table located HERE will reveal that 11 states dominate the abortion market. These 11 states include California (157,350), New York (119,940), Florida (75,990), Texas (55,230), New Jersey (44,460), Illinois (42,270), Georgia (33,000), Pennsylvania (32,030), North Carolina (29,960), Michigan (29,120), and Maryland (28,140). The major reason the Texas figures are so high is that Texas has the second highest population of the states in the union. An investigation of this table will reveal that the top 11 states in percentages of pregnancies aborted include: New York (31%), District of Columbia (29%), Delaware (27%), Maryland (27%), New Jersey (26%), Connecticut (24%), Florida (24%), Rhode Island (24%), California (23%), Massachusetts (21%), and Nevada (21%). The table from which this data was extracted also includes the racial distribution of abortion data from 2013 when it was provided by the states.

(Back To Top)

According to the web site www.abort73.com :

40% of minors having an abortion report that neither of their parents knew about the abortion (AGI). 39 states currently enforce parental consent or notification laws for minors seeking an abortion: AL, AK, AR, AZ, CO, DE, FL, GA, IA, ID, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, MI, MN, MO, MS, MT, NC, ND, NE, NH, OH, OK, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, WI, WV, and WY. The Supreme Court ruled that minors must have the alternative of seeking a court order authorizing the procedure (AGI).
[http://abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/ : Accessed November 1, 2017]

The US Supreme Court has ruled that even when parents disapprove of their minor child’s decision to have an abortion that the child has the right to petition the state courts to overrule the parent’s decision. In some states, the doctor has the right to overrule the parent’s decision. For a table identifying the parental consent requirements for each state click HERE .
In mothers who were less than 15 years old, there were 13,000 baby murdering abortions in 1990, 9,000 in 2000, and 6,000 in 2007. According to CDC Table 5, Reported Abortions Among Adolescents, for the year 2012 there were 2,213 abortions that were performed on girls that were 14 years old or younger. These figures did not include 9 reporting areas including California, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, Vermont, and Wyoming. California and Florida are the number 1 and number 3, respectively, abortion providers in the United States. [https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6410a1.htm?s_cid=ss6410a1_e#tab3 : Accessed November 1, 2017] FOR FULL DOCUMENT FROM THIS WEB SITE CLICK HERE . In 2013 there were a total of 1,189 abortions performed on girls that were less than 15 years old. Of these 338 (28.4%) were white, 566 (47.6%)were black , 57 (4.8%) were other (not defined by CDC), and 228 (19.2%) were Hispanic. In the age group 15-19 there were 41,177 (11.4%) abortions reported in 2013. These figures do not include huge numbers of the abortions that were performed in 2013. However, they are good to extract statistical data from that will give us some very telling percentages.

(Back To Top)

A partial birth abortion is one where the baby is pulled almost completely through the birthing canal with the exception of the head. The back of the baby’s head is then brutally stabbed and opened up with a sharp object. The baby’s brains is then sucked out. Partial birth abortions are legal games that these monster’s play to keep from being charged with murder. The snuff out the life of the baby before he or she exits the womb. Therefore, it is not “technically” murder. Here is what the web site abort73.com has to say about this butchering process:

Though medical jargon helps mask the barbarity of what is being described, it remains a chilling account. There are two ways the abortionist can get the baby's head (cranium) through the mother's cervix. The head can be crushed with forceps or it can be punctured with a sharp instrument so that the brain can be removed by suction aspiration. If the baby is delivered head first (cephalic presentation), the top of the head (calvarium) can be punctured externally! Because a portion of either the baby's head or body is outside the womb before the abortion takes place, lawmakers labeled the procedure, "partial birth abortion."
Included in the statute of the 2003 Partial-Birth Abortion Ban is the assertion that, "moral, medical, and ethical consensus exists that the practice of performing a partial-birth abortion… is a gruesome and inhumane procedure that is never medically necessary and should be prohibited." The reason I call this ban an absurdity is not because I disagree with the law's assertion, but because partial-birth abortion is no more "gruesome and inhumane" than any other form of abortion. And if you read the accounts of D&E and D&X side by side, you'd be hard pressed to say that D&X is the more gruesome of the two. In fact, one of the advantages the NAF attributes to D&X is the opportunity it affords grieving mothers to "hold an intact fetus." (173) By comparison, D&E tears the baby's entire body to pieces.
[http://www.abort73.com/blog/the_absurdity_of_banning_partial-birth_abortion/ : Accessed November 1, 2017]. FOR FULL DOCUMENT FROM THIS WEB SITE CLICK HERE .

Do the abortionists not understand how vile this sounds. What, a “grieving mother to hold an intact fetus”, the very baby that she has just participated in the murder of?!? That Satanic sentiment is straight out of the pits of hell! These people are nothing more than hired contract murderers; hit men and women if you will.

(Back To Top)

Abortion is also used to much greater degree among Hispanic and Black women. Though Hispanic women only represented 12.8% of the population in 2000, they accounted for 20.1% of the total abortions in the United States. During that same period, though black women only represented 13.7% of the population, they accounted for 31.7% of the total abortions in the United States. Take note of the following quote from the web site http://www.breitbart.com :

Additionally, while black Americans comprise 13.3 percent of the U.S. population, they make up 36 percent of the total abortions “reported” in 2013, according to the CDC’s latest report. In 2014, the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Office also released a report that revealed more black babies are aborted than are born in that city. During his mayoral campaign, pro-abortion New York City Mayor Bill De Blasio pledged to partner with Planned Parenthood to expand his city’s abortion businesses and to wipe out pro-life pregnancy centers. [http://www.breitbart.com/abortion/2016/12/05/cdc-report-new-york-city-abortion-rate-60-birth-rate/ : Accessed November 1, 2017]. FOR FULL DOCUMENT FROM THIS WEB SITE CLICK HERE .
The following information on Planned Parenthood abortion clinics is provided by the web site lifeissues.org:

Moreover, Protecting Black Life, an outreach of Life Issues Institute, documented in its 2012 research that Planned Parenthood targets women of color for abortion by placing 79 percent of its surgical abortion facilities within walking distance of minority neighborhoods. Worse yet, our recent research shows that the abortion giant has accelerated this targeting of minorities near its 25 new abortion mega-centers. Protecting Black Life evaluated the populations within walking distance (2 mile radius) of each of these 25 abortion mega-centers and found that an alarming 88 percent (22 of 25) target women of color. Disturbingly, 80 percent target Black communities, 56 percent target Hispanic/Latino neighborhoods and 80 percent target one or more colleges. In total, 96 percent (24 of 25) of the mega-centers target women of color, college women, or both.
[https://www.lifeissues.org/2017/02/investigation-planned-parenthood-speeds-targeting-minorities/ : Accessed on November 1, 2017]. FOR FULL DOCUMENT FROM THIS WEB SITE CLICK HERE .
Planned Parenthood denies that there is racial profiling in the location of their clinics, but the facts here tell a different story. In the article just quoted, Protecting Black Life shows how the Guttmacher Institute, a “former” arm of Planned Parenthood, used zip code manipulation to purposefully stack the data to falsely show that the majority of Planned Parenthood clinics are not located in minority neighborhoods. We would encourage to read the entire article.
Again, in 2013 there were a total of 1,189 abortions performed on girls that were less than 15 years old. Of these 338 (28.4%) were white, 566 (47.6%)were black , 57 (4.8%) were other (not defined by CDC), and 228 (19.2%) were Hispanic. Why is there racial disparity in the statistics? Could there be an agenda here related to racial and ethnic prejudices. It should be noted that the founder of Planned Parenthood, Margaret Sanger, was a racist and a eugenist. The whole cadre of leftists in America is anti American, anti God, and antichrist to its wicked, vile, and violent core. The leaders of the abortionists and evolutionists run hand in hand with their eugenic and racist agenda. The father of evolution, Charles Darwin, was a racist. In one of the greatest acts of political deception that the world has known, the United States Democratic Party pulled off one of the greatest ideological political coupes in the history of the world when they convinced blacks that the Democrat Party was the party of and for blacks. The Democrat Party is the party of the worst racists in American history. Any honest person who researches the history will know that statement is true. The Democrat Party is the party of abortionists who have promoted black genocide through their racist abortion, evolution, and socialist humanist agenda. WE WOULD ENCOURAGE YOU TO VISIT THE WEBSITE BLACKGENOCIDE.ORG .


(Back To Top)
Planned Parenthood is the largest abortion provider in the world. Note the following quote from the National Right To Life Committee:

Planned Parenthood is responsible for more than 1/3 of all abortions in the United States...In 2013, abortions at Planned Parenthood outnumbered adoption referrals 174 to 1....Based on data from their own annual report from 2013-2014, nearly one in eight women walking through the door of a Planned Parenthood clinic has an abortion. [http://www.nrlc.org/uploads/communications/stateofabortion2017.pdf (page 60): Accessed November 1, 2017] FOR THE FULL DOCUMENT CLICK HERE .
The web site abort73.com made the following statement:

It's also worth mentioning that 98% of the pregnant women who visit Planned Parenthood for counseling (the nation's largest abortion chain) end up having an abortion. Less than half of one percent choose adoption. Abortion clinics don't deliver babies. They kill babies (and sell birth control), which is why it's absurd to suggest that the physicians in their employ are objectively concerned about what's in the best interest of their "patients." As former Planned Parenthood director, Abby Johnson, reveals, Planned Parenthood's primary operating objective is to keep their abortion revenue up. [http://www.abort73.com/blog/doctor_or_abortionist/ : Accessed November, 2017]. FOR FULL DOCUMENT FROM THIS WEB SITE CLICK HERE .

Planned Parenthood would more appropriately called Planned Deathhood. To call anything that promotes abortion “planned parenthood” does extreme violence to the English language. How can anyone be called a parent who would execute the very child to whom they are supposed to be the mother or father to?!? What hypocrites! It is deception to name an organization “Planned Parenthood”that is the biggest single abortion provider in the United States. They are dedicated to the destruction of millions of would be homes and would be parents. They do not have a clue what parenthood is all about.
Planned Parenthood is a money making machine that pays huge salaries to its management. Note the following figures:

Planned Parenthood reports that over 40 of its executives earned salaries of $200,000 or more over the years 2009 to 2013. One Planned Parenthood employees earned $311,497. Three other Planned Parenthood employees earned between $377,000 and $399,00. Two Planned Parenthood employees earned between $439,000 and $460,000. From 2009 to 2013, Planned Parenthood and its related organizations paid President Cecile Richards more than $2.47 million, which includes $590,928 for 2013. [Source: Congressional Oversight Memorandum dated September 29, 2015] TO READ THE ENTIRE MEMORANDUM CLICK HERE .

Abortion is a lucrative INDUSTRY for Planned Parenthood. Since the abominable Roe versus Wade Supreme Court decision in 1973, Planned Parenthood has steadily increased its MARKET SHARE of the ABORTION MARKET. It started at a low of .67% of the MARKET in 1973 and by the end of 2011 had increased its MARKET SHARE to 31.59%. There has not been a year since 1973 that Planned Parenthood’s MARKET SHARE has not increased. Make no mistake about it, they are in the business of generating revenues from the massacre of innocent babies. Since Roe versus Wade in 1973, Planned Parenthood has murdered 5,953,918 on its baby chopping blocks.
The Planned Parenthood Federation of America (PPFA) took in $1.296 billion in revenues in the fiscal year ending on 6/30/15. Your tax dollars alone accounted for 42.7% of PPFA’s annual revenue, a total of $553,700,000 in government grants and reimbursements. Major private contributors to PPFA include billionaire financier Warren Buffett and Microsoft founder Bill Gates. Planned Parenthood’s estimated revenue from abortion in 2015 was at least $155,519,500...

[http://www.nrlc.org/uploads/communications/stateofabortion2017.pdf (page 61): Accessed November 1, 2017] FOR THE FULL DOCUMENT CLICK HERE .

As stated in their 2015/2016 annual business report for the year ending June 30, 2016 Planned Parenthood had total revenues of $1.354 billion with $554,600,000 of that coming from government funding. This “non-profit” organization had $77,5000,000 in profits for this reporting period. They performed 328,348 abortions during that period. By our reckoning, Planned Parenthood generated at least $151,600,000 in revenue from abortions in the year ended June 30, 2016. Their revenues from abortions were probably much higher since we used the lower of the two figures from the fee schedule posted on the internet from Planned Parenthood’s Western Pennsylvania Clinic’s web site located at:

[https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-western-pennsylvania/patients/fees-services ; Accessed on November 1,2017]

Planned Parenthood has been caught red handed violating Federal laws prohibiting the sale of baby parts. United States Code 42 U.S.C. 289g-2 states:

289g–2. Prohibitions regarding human fetal tissue
(a) Purchase of tissue
It shall be unlawful for any person to knowingly acquire, receive, or otherwise transfer any human fetal tissue for valuable consideration if the transfer affects interstate commerce.
[https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/granule/USCODE-2010-title42/USCODE-2010-title42-chap6A-subchapIII-partH-sec289g-2 : Accessed November 1, 2017]. FOR FULL DOCUMENT FROM THIS WEB SITE CLICK HERE .

By legal definition “valuable consideration” is defined as:

a necessary element of a contract, which confers a benefit on the other party. Valuable consideration can include money, work, performance, assets, a promise or abstaining from an act. [http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=2210 : Accessed November 1, 2017]
Note the following documentation provided by The Center For Medical Progress (CMP):

According to contracts and invoices, the real-life fetal organ and tissue wholesaler companies Novogenix, StemExpress, and Advanced Bioscience Resources all made monthly payments to Planned Parenthood based on the number of resalable fetal specimens the wholesalers’ workers could harvest inside the abortion clinics. Planned Parenthood told Congressional investigators it kept no contemporaneous records of actual costs for reimbursement under the law.

The Novogenix contract promises Planned Parenthood Los Angeles $45 “per donated specimen.” Planned Parenthood Los Angeles does over 15,000 abortions every year, but has never publicly admitted how much money they received total under their contract with Novogenix. In December 2016, the Senate Judiciary Committee and the House Select Investigative Panel both referred Planned Parenthood Los Angeles and Novogenix to the FBI and U.S. Department of Justice for further investigation and criminal prosecution.

CMP project lead David Daleiden notes, “The fact that Novogenix, StemExpress, and ABR stationed their own workers inside Planned Parenthood abortion clinics to perform the harvesting, packaging, and transport of aborted baby body parts demonstrates that Planned Parenthood had no reimbursable costs under the law. The volume-based sums that Planned Parenthood charged these businesses for baby parts are criminal trafficking and profiteering in fetal body parts. The U.S. Department of Justice should take heed of the Congressional investigations’ criminal referrals and prosecute Planned Parenthood to the full extent of the law, and taxpayers must stop being forced to subsidize Planned Parenthood’s criminal abortion empire.”
[http://www.centerformedicalprogress.org/2017/04/2027/ : Accessed November 1, 2017]
The Center For Medical Progress is the organization whose journalists went undercover and recorded videos that implicated Planned Parenthood clinics in the promotion of the sale of baby tissue whose abortions were specifically performed with the intent of delivering whole organs including hearts, brains, and livers to buyers. That was done in violation of United States Code 42 U.S.C. 289g-2. The web site for the Center For Medical Progress is located at: http://www.centerformedicalprogress.org/ . After the United States Congress completed their investigation of Planned Parenthood, they referred several Planned Parenthood clinics and their buyers to the FBI and the Justice Department for criminal investigation, indictment, and prosecution.


(Back To Top)
Unfortunately, the Center For Disease Control (CDC) Atlanta has stopped providing abortion statistics. We understand that CDC stopped in 2014. Most of the statistics that are available are coming from the pro abortion Alan Guttmacher Institute (AGI). In the year 2017 a baby is being murdered (aborted) on average of one every 34 seconds in the United States of America. What that equates to is 2,550 babies a day. Where is the government reporting?
Most of the time, government abortion statistics from reporting agencies such as the Center For Disease Control (CDC) cannot be trusted because many times they do not include statistics from many states including some very large states such as California. California statistics are omitted in all these reports. Since 2001, California has not made abortion statistics publicly available. In other words, the figures are not a matter of public record. When California’s statistics are omitted, the statistics are extremely misleading and skewed since California is the number one baby killing state in the United States. From the last reporting period, California, Maryland, and New Hampshire were excluded from the government statistics. To exclude California from the statistics, is to exclude 18% of the abortions performed in America. Maryland performs roughly 3% of the abortions in America. Between these two mass murderers, roughly 21% of the baby killings take place. Therefore, the CDCs figures are inaccurate and do not reflect how serious the issue is. The CDCs most recent report, Abortion Surveillance, issued on November 25, 2011 only reports figures through 2008. Five examples will serve to illustrate the inaccuracies and under reporting contained in this CDC report. Table 1 from this report did include figures from Alaska (1999-2002), California (1999-2008), Louisiana (2005), Maryland (2007-2008), New Hampshire (1999-2008), Oklahoma (1999), and West Virginia (2003-2004). Table 2 also did not reflect any California figures. Table 4 did not include figures from California, Florida, Maryland, New Hampshire and Wyoming. Table 5 did not include figures from California, Florida, Illinois, Louisiana, Maryland, New Hampshire, and Wyoming. This report includes 25 tables and it is not unusual to see the data missing from at least ten (10) states. One of the major sources of information on abortion statistics is the Guttmacher Institute, which is an arm of the wicked and ungodly Planned Parenthood baby killing machine. The abortion figures from the Guttmacher Institute are almost always higher than the statistics supplied through the federal government organizations such as the Centers For Disease Control (CDC). What all this reveals is that the figures are being way under reported especially since the numbers are much higher for the pro abortion Guttmacher Institute, an arm of Planned Parenthood. It is to the political and economic benefit of these pro-abortion organizations that the enormity of the problem not be known.
If the federal government and state governments are going to sanction and/or legalize the murder of babies, there should be a federal law requiring every abortion that is performed anywhere in United States territory to be reported to the federal government. That law should specify criminal penalties and jail terms for those who refuse to meet reporting standards or are criminally negligent in meeting reporting requirements. There should be some statistical reporting rules and standards established that require every abortionist to report their abortions. A federal reporting form should be created that would require the reporting of the date of the abortion, the city and state of residence of the person seeking the abortion, the age of the mother, the race of the mother, the race of the father, number of babies involved in the abortion, whether the parental consent of BOTH parents was given by the parents of a minor child, the number of weeks into the pregnancy, marital status, number of previous abortions, number of previous live births, whether rape was involved, whether incest was involved, the reason the mother felt the abortion was necessary, the total cost of the abortion, what the exact source of the payment for the abortion was, the exact abortion procedure used, the name of the abortionist performing the abortion, and the name of the abortion clinic or facility used. Every hospital and abortion provider should be required to issue a death certificate for each abortion performed. Federal law prohibits the payment for abortions from federal funds. Federal law should prohibit the federal government from providing any Federal funds to any business that provides abortions. That is the only way that abortion businesses can be stopped from “piggy backing” Federal funds for abortions on top of so-called women’s reproductive health services.


(Back To Top)

Abortion was legalized in the United States in 1973 by the United States Supreme court in the Roe vs Wade abominable decision. The following twenty-two (22) Supreme Court decisions have impacted the ungodly abortion laws in the United States (Source: National Right To Life Committee: Supreme Court Decisions Abortion) (Note: As of October 24, 2017, the Supreme Court has much more than 22 items listed on its web pages that deal with abortion. So, there is much more than the 22 items included here):

Roe v. Wade 1973 Relying on an unstated “right of privacy" found in a “penumbra” of the Fourteenth Amendment, the Court effectively legalized abortion on demand throughout the full nine months of pregnancy. Although the Court mentioned the state's possible interest in the “potentiality of human life" in the third trimester, legislation to protect that interest would be gutted by mandated exceptions for the “health” of the mother (see Doe below). 

Doe v. Bolton 1973 Companion case to Roe, Doe broadly defined the “heath” exception so that any level of distress or discomfort would qualify and gave the abortionist final say over what qualified: “The medical judgment may be exercised in the light of all factors–physical, emotional, psychological, familial, and the woman's age–relevant to the well being of the patient. All these factors may relate to “health." Because the application of the health exception was left to the abortionist, legislation directly prohibiting any abortion became practically unenforceable. 

Bigelow v. Virginia, Connecticut v. Menillo 1975 Bigelow allowed abortion clinics to advertise. Menillo said that despite Roe, state prohibitions against abortion stood as applied to nonphysicians; states could also authorize non-physicians to perform abortions. Singleton v. Wulff 1976 Allowed abortionists to challenge abortion-funding restrictions on behalf of their female patients. Previously, only a patient had standing in abortion cases, so this ruling had a significant impact on abortion litigation. 

Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth 1976 The court rejected a parental consent requirement and decided that (married) fathers had no rights in the abortion decision. Furthermore, the Court struck down Missouri's effort to ban the saline amniocentesis abortion procedure, in which salt injected into the womb slowly and painfully poisons the child. 

Maher v. Roe, Beal v. Doe 1977 States are not required to fund abortions, though they can if they choose. A state can use funds to encourage childbirth over abortion. 

Poelker v. Doe 1977 A state can prohibit the performance of abortions in public hospitals. 

Colautti v. Franklin 1979 Although Roe said states could pursue an interest in the “potential life” of the unborn child after viability (Roe placed this at the third trimester), the Court struck down a Pennsylvania statute that required abortionists to use the abortion technique most likely to result in live birth if the fetus is viable. 

Bellotti v. Baird (II)* 1979 Set the standard for parental consent legislation. The Court struck down a Massachusetts law requiring a minor to obtain the consent of both parents before obtaining an abortion, insisting that states wanting to offer a “judicial bypass” exception by which the child could demonstrate her maturity to a judge or show that the abortion would somehow be in her best interest. *In Bellotti v. Baird (l) 1976, the Court returned case to the state court on a procedural issue. 

Harris v. McRae 1980 The Court upheld Hyde Amendment, which restricted federal funding of abortion to cases here the mother’s life was endangered (rape and incest exceptions were later added). The Court said states could distinguish between abortion and "other medical procedures" because “no other procedure involves the purposeful termination of a potential life.” While the Court insisted that a woman had a right to an abortion, the state was not required to fund the exercise of that right. 

Williams v. Zbaraz 1980 States are not required to fund abortions that are not funded by the federal government, but can opt to do so. 

HL v. Matheson 1981 Upholding a Utah statute, the Court ruled that a state could require an abortionist to notify one of the minor girl's parents before performing an abortion without a judicial bypass. 

City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health 1983 The Court struck down an ordinance passed by the City of Akron requiring: (1) that abortionists inform their clients of the medical risks of abortion, of fetal development and of abortion alternatives; (2) a 24- hour waiting period after the first visit before obtaining an abortion; (3) that second- and third-trimester abortions be performed in hospitals; (4) one-parent parental consent with no judicial bypass; (5) and the “humane and sanitary” disposal of fetal remains. Later, the Court reversed some of this ruling in Casey. 

Planned Parenthood Association of Kansas City v. Ashcroft 1983 Upheld a Missouri law requiring that post-viability abortions be attended by a second physician and that a pathology report be filed for each abortion. 

Simopoulos v. Virginia 1983 Affirmed conviction of an abortionist for performing a second-trimester abortion in an improperly licensed facility. 

Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 1986 Struck down a Pennsylvania law requiring: (1) that abortionists inform their clients regarding fetal development and the medical risks of abortion; (2) reporting of information about the mother and the unborn child for second- and third-trimester abortions; (3) that the physician use the method of abortion most likely to preserve the life of a viable unborn child; and (4) the attendance of a second physician in post-viability abortions. Later, the Court reversed some of this ruling (see Casey below). 

Webster v. Reproductive Health Services 1989 Upheld Missouri statute prohibiting the use of public facilities or personnel for abortions and requiring abortionists to determine the viability of the unborn child after 20 weeks. 

Hodgson v. Minnesota, Ohio v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health 1990 In Hodgson, struck down Minnesota statute requiring two-parent notification without a judicial bypass, but upheld the same provision with a judicial bypass. In the same decision, the Court allowed a 48- hour waiting period for minors following parental notification. In Ohio v. Akron, the Court upheld one-parent notification with judicial bypass. 

Rust v. Sullivan 1991 Upheld federal regulation prohibiting Title X family planning clinic personnel from counseling or referring women regarding abortion. If a clinic physically and financially separated abortion services from family planning services, the family planning component could still receive Title X money. Relying on Maher and Harris, the Court emphasized that the government is not obliged to fund abortion-related services, even if it funds parental care or childbirth. 

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey 1992 By a sharply divided vote of 5-4, the Court reaffirmed the “central holding” of Roe, but in a 7-2 vote, suggested that states could pursue their interest in "potential" life, explicitly overruling parts of Akron and Thomburg by allowing informed consent requirements (that the woman be given information on the risks of abortion and on fetal development), a mandatory 24-hour waiting period following receipt of the information, the collection of abortion statistics, and a required one-parent consent with judicial bypass. Spousal notification provisions, however, were held unconstitutional. 

Mazurek v. Armstrong 1997 Upheld Montana law requiring that only licensed physicians perform abortions. 

Stenberg v. Carhart 2000 Nebraska (as did more than half the other states) passed a law to ban partial-birth abortion, a method in which the premature infant (usually in the fifth or sixth month) is delivered alive, feet first, until only the head remains in the womb. The abortionist then punctures the baby's skull and removes her brain. On a 5-4 vote, the Court struck down the Nebraska law (and thereby rendered the other state laws unenforceable, as well). The five justices said that the Nebraska legislature had defined the method too vaguely. In addition, the five justices held that Roe v. Wade requires that an abortionist be allowed to use even this method, even on a healthy woman, if he believes it is the safest method. 

Gonzales v. Carhart 2007 Stating that, in light of Casey, the state did have an interest in protecting fetal life, and that the law did not impose an “undue burden,” the court upheld the federal version of the Partial-birth Abortion Act, passed by Congress and signed by President George W. Bush in 2003. The court was satisfied that the language of the statute was clear.

Thirty-five (35) states currently enforce parental consent or notification laws for minors seeking an abortion: AL, AR, AZ, CO, DE, FL, GA, IA, ID, IN, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, MI , MN, MO, MS, NC, ND, NE, OH, OK, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, WI, WV, and WY. The Supreme Court ruled that minors must have the alternative of seeking a court order authorizing the procedure. For an up to date table listing consent requirements for each state as of 11/1/2017 click HERE .The U.S. Congress has barred the use of federal Medicaid funds to pay for abortions, except when the woman's life would be endangered by a full-term pregnancy or in cases of rape or incest. Pro-abortion activists lied to the American people, Congress, and President Clinton during the debates to ban partial-birth abortion by stating that the procedure was rarely performed except in the case where the life of the mother was at stake. The fact is, that the procedure was/is performed most frequently on healthy mothers carrying healthy babies. That was the case then in 1997 and it is still the case today in 2012.  For documentation on the lies that were told click HERE and HERE. For written instructions [by the devil (Haskell) who designed it] on how a partial-birth abortion is performed, click HERE. WARNING: THIS IS VERY GRAPHIC. Thirty-three (33)states have enacted laws to ban partial-birth abortions. Twelve (12) of these state laws have been permanently blocked by a court order as of October 1, 2017. Twelve (12) of these states have laws that are in effect as of October 1, 2017. Though they have not been challenged, seven (7) states have laws that are assumed to be unenforceable by the US Supreme Court’s 2000 decision in Stenberg vs Carhart overturning the Nebraska law. In one state, the law is temporarily enjoined pending court review. For a PDF file identifying the details of the rulings as they relate to specific states click HERE .

According to Abort73.com, seventeen (17) states (AK, AZ, CA, CT, HI, IL, MA, MD, MN, MT, NJ, NM, NY, OR, VT, WA and WV) do use public funds to pay for abortions for some poor women. About 14% of all abortions in the United States are paid for with public funds (virtually all from the state). [Source: http://www.abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/ : Accessed November 1, 2017]. FOR FULL DOCUMENT FROM THIS WEB SITE CLICK HERE .


(Back To Top)

The following figures were pulled from the Planned Parenthood Abortion mill of Western Pennysylvania on October 24, 2017:


4-11 WEEKS  $415  $555 
12-14 WEEKS  $525  $565 
14-15 WEEKS  $895  $935 
15-17 WEEKS  $945  $985 
17-18 WEEKS  $1070  $1,110 
4-10 WEEKS 

[https://www.plannedparenthood.org/planned-parenthood-western-pennsylvania/patients/fees-services ; Accessed on October 24,2017].FOR FULL DOCUMENT FROM THIS WEB SITE CLICK HERE .

Abortion is big business in the United States with abortions costing at least $450 in 2011. What that means is that the abortion industry generated at least $545,580,000 in 2011. Note that as of October 24, 2017 that the cheapest abortions cost $415 according to the above fee schedule. It is significant to note that Planned Parenthood makes much of their claim that the “majority (?!?)” of their services are not for abortions which is a bogus claim that manipulates statistics to make an abortion have the same statistical weight as a pregnancy test, breast exam, or a Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) test. That is a deceitful practice that is designed to deceive Americans since Planned Parenthood counts on most Americans not to analyze the “whys” and “wherefores” of their statistics. No honest person would even consider equating an abortion with an STD test. It is also significant to note that there are no fee schedules for any procedures other than abortions posted to the web site for Planned Parenthood of Western Pennsylvania. There is but one conclusion that can be drawn from that. Then primary focus of their business is abortion. Planned Parenthood is the largest single provider of baby killings in the United States. Planned Parenthood receives almost one-third of it revenues from abortions. Planned Parenthood received 41% of its budget from government funding in the year ended June 30, 2016. Planned Parenthood reported that they performed 329,445 abortions in 2010 with 31% of their revenues coming from abortions. That would be $148,250,250 from abortions. Under Obamacare, that figure is expected to grow to $1.7 billion. Under Obamacare, the entire abortion industry is expected to grow to $7.2 billion. These figures only apply when the abortion is performed at ten weeks or less into the pregnancy. Some late term abortions can cost as much as $3,000. During 2010, “Planned Parenthood” only referred 841 pregnant mothers for adoption services. That figure is equal to .25% of the abortions they performed. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) allows taxpayers to deduct the cost of an abortion as a medical expense. That practice should be stopped since it circumvents the intent of federal law that prohibits federal funding for abortions.
In the reporting period for 2015-2016 ending in June 2016, only made available in the last week of May 2017, Planned Parenthood reported that they performed 328,348 abortions (up 4,300 from the previous year), had total revenues of $1.3543 billion, government funding of $554.6 million, and $77.5 million in profit. Again, that means that 41% of Planned Parenthood revenues came from government funding in 2016. Remember that Planned Parenthood is supposed to be a non profit organization! [SOURCE for the information in this paragraph: Planned Parenthood 2015-2016 Annual Business Report] See pages 25-29 of the Planned Parenthood 2015-2016 Annual Business Report located HERE .


(Back To Top)

There are nine basic methods of aborting (killing/murdering) babies. These include very early abortion, suction aspiration/vacuum curettage, dilation and curettage (D&C), RU 486, methotrexate, dilation and evacuation (D&E), instillation methods, partial birth abortion, and hysterotomy. The following materials is a direct quote from the National Right To Life Committee document entitled Abortion Techniques.

Very Early Abortion Designed to be used as soon as pregnancy can be chemically detected. After widening the cervix, the abortionist inserts into the uterus a long flexible tube which is attached to a vacuum syringe. Using ultrasound, the abortionist locates the tiny human embryo in the womb and applies suction to tear the developing baby from the uterine wall.
Suction Aspiration/Vacuum Curettage
For An Illustration Click Here
A powerful suction tube with a sharp cutting edge is inserted into the womb through the dilated cervix. The suction dismembers the body of the developing baby and tears the placenta from the wall of the uterus, sucking the contents into a collection bottle.
Dilitation and Curettage (D&C) Here, the cervix is dilated or stretched to permit the insertion of a loop shaped steel knife. The body of the baby is cut in pieces and removed and the placenta is scraped off the uterine wall. (Note from the author: This procedure is not always wrong. It is a procedure that is followed by a doctor following the miscarriage of a baby that some mother is trying to carry to full term).
RU 486 The RU 486 procedure requires at least three trips to the abortion facility. In her first visit, the woman is given the RU 486 pills, which block the action of progesterone, the natural hormone vital to maintaining the rich nutrient lining of the uterus. The developing baby starves as the nutrient lining disintegrates. At a second visit 36 to 48 hours later, the woman is given a dose of artificial prostaglandins, usually misoprostol, which initiates uterine contractions to expel the body of the embryonic baby. A third visit about two weeks later determines if the abortion has taken place. At least 4% must return for surgical abortions.
Methotrexate Another multi-visit procedure. In the first visit a woman receives an intramuscular injection of Methotrexate, a powerful drug anti-metabolite which is often used to fight cancer. Methotrexate attacks the fast growing cells of the trophoblast, the tissue surrounding the embryo that eventually gives rise to the placenta. As the trophoblast breaks down, the baby dies as she is deprived of needed food, oxygen, and fluids. A prostaglandin suppository given three to seven days later triggers expulsion of the child from the woman’s uterus. Sometimes this occurs in the next few hours, but often a second dose of prostaglandin is required. Those shown to be still pregnant in later visits (at least 1 in 25) are given surgical abortions,
Dilation and Evacuation
For An Illustration Click Here

Forceps with sharp metal jaws are used to grasp parts of the developing baby, which are then twisted and torn away. This continues until the baby’s entire body is removed from the womb. Because the baby’s skull has been hardened to bone by this time, the skull must sometimes be compressed or crushed to facilitate removal. (Click HERE for the very graphic testimony of Dr. Anthony Levatino before the Judiciary Committee of the U. S. House Of Representatives on May 17, 2012)
Instillation Methods After fluid is withdrawn, chemicals are injected into the amniotic sac to kill the baby and initiate contractions. Saline poisons the child and burns the baby’s skin. Other methods such as urea and prostaglandins mainly work by initiating violent contractions, but are generally lest effective as saline. Sometimes, chemicals such as potassium chloride or digoxin are injected directly into the baby’s heart, triggering cardiac arrest.
Partial-Birth Abortion
For An Illustration Click Here
Used in the fifth and sixth months of pregnancy, and sometimes later. Guided by ultrasound, the abortionist reaches into the uterus, grabs the unborn baby’s leg with forceps, and pulls the baby into the birth canal, except for the head, which is deliberately kept just inside the womb (At this point in the abortion, the baby is alive). Then the abortionist punctures the base of the baby’s skull with a long surgical scissors or other instrument. He enlarges the wound and inserts a catheter (tube), which is connected to a powerful suction machine that sucks the baby’s brain out. The abortionist then with draws the now collapsed skull from the uterus.
Hysterotomy Similar to the Caesarean Section, this method is generally used if chemical methods such as salt poisoning or prostaglandins fail. Incisions are made in the abdomen and uterus and the baby, placenta, and amniotic sac are removed.


RU486 is a very dangerous drug that causes heavy prolonged bleeding, pain, nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, infection, fatigue, fainting, skin conditions, anemia, asthenia, hot flashes, heart palpitations, breast conditions, mood changes, and thirst. The National Right To Life Committee documented the dangers of RU486 and the deaths of eleven (11) mothers from the use of RU486. One of these mothers was 16 years old. For the full report click on the following link:

[http://www.nrlc.org/uploads/factsheets/FS10pilldanger.pdf  : Accessed November 1, 2017] OR FOR THE FULL DOCUMENT FROM THIS SITE CLICK HERE


(Back To Top)

The following table summarizes the growth of the baby in the mother’s womb:

Day 1

fertilization: all human chromosomes present; unique human life begins

Day 6

embryo begins implanting in the uterus

Day 22

heart begins to beat with the child’s own blood, often a different blood type than the mother’s

Week 5

eyes, legs ,hands begin to develop

Week 6

brain waves detectable; mouth, lips present; fingers forming 2

Week 7

eyelids, toes form; nose distinct, baby kicking and swimming

Week 8

every organ in place; bones, fingerprints 2 begin to form

Weeks 9 and 10

 teeth begin to form, fingernails develop; baby can turn head, frown

Week 11

 baby can grasp objects placed in hand

Week 17

 baby can have dream (REM) sleep


(Back To Top)

One of the most important questions that is almost never discussed is whether an unborn baby can feel pain. An unborn baby has less legal protection from feeling pain than do animals that are taken into a slaughterhouse. The following information is directly quoted from the National Right To Life Committee report “Pain Of The Unborn” that was published in 2004: 

While an unborn child cannot verbally express the pain she experiences, all biological indicators suggest unborn children are capable of feeling pain by at least 20 weeks.

18 Days: Brain The brain begins to take shape only 18 days after conception. By 20 days, the brain has already differentiated into forebrain, midbrain, and hind brain, and the spinal cord has started to grow.
5 Weeks: Pain Receptors  Four or five weeks after conception, pain receptors appear around the mouth, followed by nerve fibers, which carry stimuli to the brain. By 18 weeks, pain receptors have appeared throughout the body. Around week 6, the unborn child first responds to touch.
6 Weeks: Cortex  In weeks 6-18, the cerebral cortex develops. By 18 weeks the cortex has a full complement of neurons. In adults, the cortex has been recognized as the center of pain consciousness.
8 Weeks: Thalamus During weeks 8-16, the thalamus develops, functioning as the main relay center in the brain for sensory impulses going from the spinal cord to the cortex.
14-18 Wks: Nerve Tracts In week 18, nerve tracts connecting the spinal cord and the thalamus are established, and nerves from the thalamus first contact the cortex in week 20. Nerve fibers not routed through the thalamus have already reached the cortex by 14 weeks.
18 Wks: Stress Hormones  As early as 18 weeks, stress hormones are released by an unborn child injected by a needle, just as they are when adults feel pain. Hormone levels in those babies decrease as pain-relievers are supplied.
 Before 18 Weeks? Even before nerve tracts are fully established, the unborn child may feel pain; studies show anencephalic infants, whose cortex is severely reduced if not altogether missing, may experience pain as long as other neurological structures are functioning.
20 Wks: All Parts in Place With pain receptors, spinal cord, nerve tracts, thalamus, and cortex in place, all anatomical links needed for pain transmission to the brain, for feeling pain, are present.

In this same article, perintalogist (doctor for problem pregnancies) Steven Calvin stated: “The neural pathways are present for pain to be experienced quite early by unborn babies.”. The article went on to state: Scientific evidence suggests abortion is excruciatingly painful for the unborn child. Neurologist Dr. Paul Renalli stated: At 20 weeks, the fetal brain has the full complement of brain cells present in adulthood, ready and waiting to receive pain signals from the body, and their electrical activity can be be recorded by standard electroencephalography (EEG)”. Dr. Robert J. White stated: An unborn child at 20 weeks gestation “is fully capable of experiencing pain... Without question, [abortion] is a dreadfully painful experience for any infant subjected to such a surgical procedure.. The article reached three conclusions concerning the pain of the unborn: 

            1.         That between weeks 20 and 30 the unborn baby has more pain receptors per square inch than at any time before or after birth.

            2.         Pain inhibition is not fully developed until after a child has been born.

            3.         The unborn child’s experience of pain is actually heightened. 

To read the article in its entirety click here:  

[http://www.nrlc.org/uploads/factsheets/FS20UnbornPain.pdf : Accessed November 1, 2017]


(Back To Top)

Some of the women’s health risks associated with abortion include (Source: National Right To Life “Abortion Physical Complications”): 

            1.         Damage to uterus leading to future reproductive problems.

            2.         Future infertility doubling the risk of future sterility.

            3.         50% increased tubular pregnancy for one abortion, 90% for two abortions.

            4.         Increased risk of miscarriage.

            5.         Increased risk of premature births leading to increased infant death rates and cerebral palsy. 

Surgical Abortion Related 

            6.         Infection, sepsis, and endometritis.

            7.         Cervical lacerations.

            8.         Uterine, bladder, and bowel perforations.

            9.         Pelvic inflammatory disease. 

Chemical Abortion Related (RU286) 

            10.       Severe pain, cramping, nausea, and diarrhea.

            11.       Hemorrhage, infection, and rupture of ectopic. 

Abortion Related Causes Of Death 

            12.       A 30% increased risk for breast cancer. Abortion has also been linked to higher rates of cervical and ovarian cancer.

            13.       Death to the mother caused by anesthesia, infection, hemorrhage, ruptured ectopic pregnancy, and embolism

            14.       More than 350** deaths of mothers have resulted from legal abortions in the United States.

** “More than 350” is the qualifying statement here. This figure falls far short of the figures provided in Table 23 of CDC report “Abortion Surveillance — United States, 2012. This report states that from 1973-2011 that 492 women died from complications caused by an abortion. Click HERE for a PDF of the CDC report from this site. Click the following link for the report at CDC’s web site:


For a copy of the National Right To Life Committee document“Abortion Physical Complications” from their web site click below:



In 2012, four women died as a result of complications from known legal induced abortion; between 1973-2012, 427 women have died as a result of legal abortion (CDC). The number of deaths attributable to legal induced abortion was highest before the 1980s (CDC). In 1972 (the year before abortion was federally legalized), a total of 24 women died from causes known to be associated with legal abortions, and 39 died as a result of known illegal abortions (CDC). 5


(Back To Top)

Much of what is included in this section is derived from the National Right To Life Committee article titled “Abortion’s Psycho-Social Consequences”. The full text of their article is available at this link:



There is also no end to the emotional and psychological pains the mother will continue to suffer throughout their lives. Abortion affects present and future relationships. Abortion leads to self abuse and suicide. There is much post abortion emotional and mental anguish. How do abortions affect relationships? 

Not considered in many abortion decisions is the long term impact it will have on relationships. Under God, parents do not have the right to force their child to have an abortion. Under God, a child does not have the right to make the decision to abort a baby. When ungodly parents force abortions, it will affect their relationships with their pregnant child for the rest of their lives. At some point in time the grandparents will wonder what the child would have looked like and how they would have turned out had the baby not been aborted. Out of wedlock conceptions create problems in family relationships anyhow. Decisions to have abortions only further complicate those problems and add the sin of murder to the sin of fornication. The root cause of the abortion problem is the violation of God’s laws against sex outside of marriage.  Where forgiveness is not forthcoming, abortions performed without parental notification can create lifetime rifts in relationships between child and parent. Abortions also create problems in the relationships a woman has with her male partner. Many times the battle over abortion will create irreconcilable differences between the partners. Divorces and breakups are quite common even in what had been stable relationships. Statistically speaking, mothers who have abortions are much more likely to abuse other children they may have. Relationships with future partners will also be affected by past abortions resulting in an atmosphere of shame where the woman will keep secret from her partner past abortions. Many women who have had abortions become withdrawn from people in general. They end up needing counseling. 

In counseling sessions with women who have had abortions, professional counselors have identified the following characteristics:

“intense fear, anxiety, sense of helplessness feeling of loss of control emotional numbing, difficulty recalling event guilt, pain, grief, depression, irritability, angry outbursts, aggressive behavior sleep difficulties, sexual dysfunction flashbacks, nightmares, anniversary reactions withdrawal from relationships, avoidance of children pessimism regarding future drug, alcohol abuse, suicidal thoughts.” [http://www.nrlc.org/uploads/factsheets/FS07AbortionPsychoSocial.pdf : Accessed November 1, 2017]

Note also the following comments from the National Right To Life Committee:

“Women who have abortions are more likely to abuse their other children. Not surprisingly, children of aborting women have higher rates of behavior problems....More than half of women reporting post abortion problems say they have thought of suicide, with 28% actually attempting it. Government researchers in Finland found the suicide rate for women having abortions was three times the national average and nearly six times what it was for women giving birth.”
[http://www.nrlc.org/uploads/factsheets/FS07AbortionPsychoSocial.pdf : Accessed November 1, 2017]

There is much increased incidence of substance abuse, emotional problems, and psychiatric admissions among women and children having had abortions. These include:

“Greater alcohol abuse has been found among women having abortions, bringing with it greater risk of violent behavior, divorce, auto accidents, and job loss. After their abortions, women are also more likely to abuse drugs, exposing them to other health and safety risks. There are many other manifested in the post abortion behaviour of women who abort their babies.”
“Studies examining the records of over 50,000 California Medicaid patients from 1989-1994 found women who aborted having 2.6 times more psychiatric admissions in the first 90 days following pregnancy than women giving birth and 17% higher mental health claims over the following four years. For some women, abortion appears to lead to eating disorders such as binge eating, bulimia, and anorexia. Others become reckless, or attempt to cut or injure themselves. Women who have abortions are twice as likely to become heavy smokers and are more likely to continue smoking during subsequent pregnancies, increasing the risk of developmental malformations or fetal death”.
[http://www.nrlc.org/uploads/factsheets/FS07AbortionPsychoSocial.pdf : Accessed November 1, 2017]


(Back To Top)

Some folks make the ungodly argument that there is an economic benefit to abortions. Nothing could be further from the truth. If you can justify abortion based upon some falsely perceived economic benefit, then you have a heart that is as dark and as wicked as it gets. The only person that benefits economically from an abortion is the devil that performs it. Abortion has made for a much smaller work force with fewer taxes being paid than what would have been had there been no abortions. Abortions cut the available pool of workers available to pay taxes and to pay into social security. Facts are stubborn things for the pro baby killers to contend with. Abortions have led to a reduced population with less people needing the support of what would have been an expanded economy to meet their needs. Here is some of the impact documented by the National Right To Life Committee: 

            1.         17,250,839 more people would be employed.

            2.         $398,900,760,733 earned by those employees.

            3.         $11,105,397,179 contributed to Medicare.

            4.         $47,485,146,558 contributed to Social Security.

            5.         3,432,000 more retired workers could receive average monthly social security benefit check.

            6.         2,165,707 more people could receive Medicare Hospital Insurance. 

(Source: National Right To Life Committee based on data from Bureau of Labor Statistics, Social Security Administration, Guttmacher Institute, and National Center for Health Statistics.) 

[http://www.nrlc.org/uploads/factsheets/FS03MissingPersons.pdf : Accessed November 1, 2017]


What these figures prove is that had the murdered babies been allowed to live that there would have been a much expanded jobs market to feed, clothe, and provide for their other personal needs. 


(Back To Top)

The following facts are quoted from the web site http://www.abort73.com/ . 

In 2008, 84.3% of all abortions were performed on unmarried women (CDC). Women living with a partner to whom they are not married account for 25% of abortions but only about 10% of women in the population (NAF). Women between the ages of 20-24 obtained 33% of all abortions in 2008; women between 25-29 obtained 24% (CDC). In 2008, women aged 20-29 years had the highest abortion rates (29.6 abortions per 1,000 women aged 20-24 years and 21.6 abortions per 1,000 women aged 25-29 years) (CDC). 50% of U.S. women obtaining abortions are younger than 25; women aged 20-24 obtain 33% of all U.S. abortions and teenagers obtain 17% (AGI). In 2008, adolescents under 15 years obtained .05% of all abortions, but had the highest abortion ratio, 821 abortions for every 1,000 live births (CDC). 47% of women who have abortions had at least one previous abortion (AGI). Black women are more than 4.8 times more likely than non-Hispanic white women to have an abortion, and Hispanic women are 2.7 times as likely (AGI). The abortion rate of non-metropolitan women is about half that of women who live in metropolitan counties (NAF). The abortion rate of women with Medicaid coverage is three times as high as that of other women (NAF). 37% of women obtaining abortions identify themselves as Protestant, and 28% identify themselves as Catholic (AGI). At current rates, nearly one-third of American women will have an abortion (AGI).

To access the full article from their web site click on the following link: 



(Back To Top)

In 2004, the Guttmacher Institute anonymously surveyed 1,209 post-abortive women from nine different abortion clinics across the country. Of the women surveyed, 957 provided a main reason for having an abortion. This table lists each reason and the percentage of respondents who chose it.

<0.5% Victim of rape
3% Fetal health problems
4% Physical health problems
4% Would interfere with education or career
7% Not mature enough to raise a child
8% Don't want to be a single mother
19% Done having children
23% Can't afford a baby
25% Not ready for a child
6% Other
[http://abort73.com/abortion_facts/us_abortion_statistics/ : Accessed November 1, 2017]

Note the following information as to why women say they have abortions:

On average, women give at least 3 reasons for choosing abortion: 3/4 say that having a baby would interfere with work, school or other responsibilities; about 3/4 say they cannot afford a child; and ½ say they do not want to be a single parent or are having problems with their husband or partner (AGI). Only 12% of women included a physical problem with their health among reasons for having an abortion (NAF). One per cent (of aborting women) reported that they were the survivors of rape (NAF).
[http://prolifemississippi.org/Pages/Issues.html : Accessed November 1, 2017]

The National Right To Life Committee in an article published in January 2004 listed thirteen different arguments that women give as justification for abortion. These are: 

            1.         This could mean the end of my hopes and dreams.

            2.         It’s just a blob of tissue.

            3.         It’s my body, my choice.

            4.         I can’t face my parents.

            5.         The baby’s better off. 

            6.         I can’t afford a child or care for one right now.

            7.         People will look down on me for being pregnant.

            8.         There are already too many mouths to feed.

            9.         Abortion involves a basic conflict between the rights of the mother and the child. Something has to give.

            10.       Women are going to have abortions anyway, so at least make them legal and safe.

            11.       Abortion is better than teen motherhood.

            12.       The fate of feminism is tied to the “freedom to choose”.

            13.       Abortion is a religious matter between a woman and her God. 

To read a little more in depth analysis from the article itself please click this link:


The emotional and spiritual wickedness and total disrespect for the sanctity of life is reflected in all these arguments. God does not allow mothers to choose between their so-called rights and the killing of an innocent baby. God does not allow the shedding of innocent blood. It is God that gives the conception and only God can rightfully take away the conception. 


(Back To Top)

The National Right To Life Committee has prepared an 18 page booklet that instructs pro-life folks how to deal with the arguments of the pro-abortionists. This pamphlet is titled “When They Say...You Say”. In this pamphlet, they deal with the six different arguments that are used by the abortionists in defending their demands to have the monstrous option to kill babies. Under these six arguments, there are 31 separate questions discussed. These are: 

ARGUMENT 1 – It’s not a human being/person – it’s just a blob of tissue

                      do not impose your religion on me

                        the fetus is just a part of the woman's body; it’s not a baby

                        an egg and a sperm are also human life – the fetus is only a potential human being

                        it’s not a person; it has no meaningful life

                        a fetus is not a person until quickening

                        no one really knows when life begins/life begins at birth 

ARGUMENT 2 – A woman has the right to control her own body

                      even if the unborn is a human being we can't force a woman to carry a pregnancy to term against her will

                        everyone has the right to choose

                        every woman should have the right to control her own body, aka "reproductive freedom"

                        it’s a private decision between a woman and her doctor – the government should stay out of our bedrooms!

                        an unmarried girl shouldn't have to be embarrassed by carrying her pregnancy to term or have the pain of placing her baby for adoption

                        women won't ever have equal rights if abortion isn't an option

                        some women have no other choice

                        I'm personally opposed but . . . 

ARGUMENT 3 – Every child a wanted child and other social arguments

                      it's unfair to bring an unwanted child into this world

                        bearing “unwanted” children leads to child abuse

                        the poor need to limit their children or they will be forever on welfare

                        the majority of Americans are pro-choice

                        overpopulation and quality of life

                        separation of church and state – can't legislate morality 

ARGUMENT 4 – Back-alley abortions

                      tens of thousands will resort to back alley abortions and women will die

                        abortion is safer than childbirth

                        abortion is easy and painless

                        abortion may be the best answer for the woman at this time in her life 

ARGUMENT 5 – The hard cases

                      what if the woman's life is threatened

                        what if the baby has a deformity

                        what if the woman was raped or was the victim of incest 

ARGUMENT 6 – The Ad Hominem – Attack the speaker!

                      “You’re a man.”

                        “You’re too old to have children.”

                        “How many children have you adopted?”

                        No matter what the personal attack, remember to go back to basics. Abortion is the ultimate human rights issue; that’s why we ALL have the right to speak out about this issue. 

This document also includes this table that lists things that you should and should not say:





































We do not agree with the National Right To Life Committee on this entry. We believe that the proper Bible term is murder. Killing can take many forms: many of which are justified in the Bible including killing someone in combat and the death penalty for capital offenses. We realize there is a legal aspect to this National Right To Life Committee provision. When you refer to a specific individual or organization as being guilty of murder that technically makes you liable to a lawsuit since the "killing" of unborn babies is not against the law. A word of warning is in order. To protect yourself legally, when speaking in generalities always refer to abortion as murder. When addressing issues related to specific individuals or specific organizations always refer to the murders committed by the abortionist(s) as killings.


This booklet also gives some instructions on how to deal with the media when discussing abortion. The full booklet is located HERE  on this web site. The full booklet is located on National Right To Life Committee's web site at the following link:


In concluding this article we present some of the questions that are asked and some of the issues that are raised by abortionists when trying to justify abortion.

(Back To Top)

1. WHAT IF A CHILD IS UNWANTED? The rejoinder to that question is: What if a mother who never wanted an abortion had a child and then two years later decided that she did not want the child anymore? Would it be okay for her to murder the child? This is no laughing matter. There are now groups in Europe who are pushing for post birth abortions which by current legal definitions are outright murders.
2. WHAT IF THE MOTHER CANNOT AFFORD THE CHILD? The rejoinder to that question is: Should the mothers who now have children who are living in poverty be allowed to kill those children because they cannot afford them. What of the mother who loses her husband while she is raising a 3 year old boy. Should she be able to murder that child because she can no longer afford him?
3. WHAT IF THE BABY IS DEFORMED? The rejoinder to this question is: What if a four year old girl is involved in an accident and losses both of her legs? Would it be okay to murder her because she is now deformed? There are huge numbers of children and adults that were born with birth defects or have lost limbs to accidents or have disfigured faces because of accidents. Would it be okay to murder them because they are deformed and/or disfigured?
4. WHAT IF THE MOTHER IS ADDICTED TO DRUGS OR ALCOHOL? (This one assumes that because the mother is addicted to drugs, then the baby is too.) This one here is really outrageous! The rejoinder(s) to this are: If we are going to murder the baby because he or she might be addicted to drugs or alcohol, then why don’t we just murder the mother too who we know is addicted to drugs or alcohol? While we are at it, why don’t we just go ahead and gather up all the alcoholics and drug addicts and murder them too.
5. WHAT IF THE WOMAN WAS RAPED? There are a number of rejoinders to this question. What if a mother, who was the victim of rape, has a six year old son who looks just to much like his rapist father and she decides she wants to murder that six year old son? Should she be allowed to do that? The wrong of rape cannot be righted by the wrong of abortion. Rape is an act of violence against a woman that cannot be righted by another act of violence against the woman and her unborn child. As a civilized people, we should never do wrong to right a wrong and that is especially true for Christians. A solution to this problem would be adoption. In a study done by William Robert Johnson, it was documented that the number of times that rape is cited as a reason for getting an abortion constituted 0.3% of all abortions performed [http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/abreasons.html : Accessed on November 1, 2017]. FOR THE FULL DOCUMENT FROM THIS WEB SITE CLICK HERE . For the year 2014, when 926,240 abortions were performed, that would mean that approximately 2,778 abortions were performed where rape was cited as the reason for the abortion.
6. WHAT IF THE WOMAN IS A VICTIM OF INCEST? Incest is a crime that involves rape in the vast majority of the cases. There are very few cases that involve “consensual” sex. The arguments against abortion for incest are essentially the same as those for rape. In either case, the life of an innocent child is taken. In a study done by William Robert Johnson it was documented that the number of times that incest is cited as a reason for getting an abortion constituted 0.03% of all abortions performed.
[http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/policy/abortion/abreasons.html : Accessed on November 1, 2017]. FOR THE FULL DOCUMENT FROM THIS WEB SITE CLICK HERE .
For the year 2014, when 926,240 abortions were performed, that would mean that approximately 278 abortions were performed where incest was cited as the reason for the abortion.
7. WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO TO CONTROL THE POPULATION “EXPLOSION”? This one here expresses the real goal of the abortionists and that is population control. If we study the population statistics for the United States, it is a red herring because the Washington Post reported that "2006 marked the first time in 35 years that the U.S. fertility rate was high enough to sustain a stable population".[http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/12/20/AR2007122002725.html : Accessed November 1, 2017] . FOR THE FULL DOCUMENT FROM THIS WEB SITE CLICK HERE . From 1972-2005 the U.S. birth rate was below replacement (the rate necessary for a given generation to exactly replace itself)”. The assumption that the murder of babies is necessary for population control does not stop there. If we can justify the murder of babies under the false pretext of population control, then euthanasia and the execution of the handicapped and undesirables can be justified under the false pretext of population control. It is the same false pretext that Adolph Hitler used during World War II to justify the genocide of 6 million Jews and millions of others that he considered to be undesirables. Adolph Hitler’s death camps were eugenics on super steroids. It does not stop there either. In some countries it is now legal to carry out euthanasia for mentally ill persons who request it regardless of their age. We will not execute a murderer because he was not in his so-called right mind when he committed the murder, yet we will allow the execution of innocent mentally ill persons?!? America’s abortion death camps make Hitler look like a saint when compared to the American abortionists.

Many women today are aborting their babies in a process called “sex-selection abortion”. If the baby is not the gender they want, they abort the baby. Abortion for the purpose of sex selection has been outlawed in some states. In the current rabidly perverted and reprobate environment in America, what recourse will parents have if at some time in the future a gender selected child wants to have a sex change operation? Not only is that scenario possible, it is a highly likely. That is what happens when reprobate men and women try to set aside God’s laws regulating sexual conduct to feed their perverted sexual desires. America’s sexual revolution has been paid for by the blood of aborted babies.





Back To Top   Back To Home Page